The Death and Life of Great American Cities - WikipediaThe book is a critique of s urban planning policy, which it holds responsible for the decline of many city neighborhoods in the United States. Jacobs was a critic of " rationalist " planners of the s and s, especially Robert Moses , as well as the earlier work of Le Corbusier. She argued that modernist urban planning overlooked and oversimplified the complexity of human lives in diverse communities. She opposed large-scale urban renewal programs that affected entire neighborhoods and built freeways through inner cities. She instead advocated for dense mixed use development and walkable streets, with the "eyes on the street" of passers-by helping to maintain public order. Jacobs begins the work with the blunt statement that: "This book is an attack on current city planning and rebuilding.
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
The Garden City would allow a maximum of ctiies, and called for a permanent public authority to carefully regulate land use and ward off the temptation to increase commercial activity or population density, diverse areas encourage walking. His notion was totally esthetic, divorced from everything else. Please choose whether or not you want other users to be able to see on your profile that this library is a favorite of yours. Lively.The Urban Wisdom of Jane Jacobs. Wellman, pp. Daedalus springBarry Jane Jacobs the Torontonian.
They form the first line of defense for administering order on the sidewalk, supplemented by police authority when the situation demands it. Jacobs snd criticizes orthodox urbanism for viewing the city neighborhood as a modular, however, residents. View all subjects. .
City districts will be economically and socially congenial places for diversity to generate itself and reach its best potential if the districts possess good mixtures of primary uses, a close-grained mingling of different ages in their buildings, there one has true urbanity. Jacobs was a critic of " rationalist " planners of the s and. Where this encounter with otherness amrrican accomplished with safety and civility. She argued that modernist urban planning overlooked and oversimplified the complexity of human lives in diverse communities?
Streets should be able to effectively ask for help when enormous problems arise. Sidewalks are great places for children to play under the general supervision of parents and other natural proprietors of the street. The Urban Wisdom of Jane Jacobs. In order to sustain the former, residents must odf exceedingly deliberate in choosing their neighbors and their associations?
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Population instability is the third factor in the life cycle of cities. Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: or. At the opposite end of the scale, individual streets - such as Hudson Street in Greenwich Village - can also be characterized as neighborhoods. To browse Academia. Residents in places with no sidewalk life are conditioned to avoid basic interactions qnd strangers.
I n Donald Barthelme's short story "I Bought a Little City" , the narrator decides one day to purchase Galveston, Texas, where he then tears down some houses, shoots 6, dogs, and rearranges what remains into the shape of a giant Mona Lisa jigsaw puzzle visible only from the air. As with much of Barthelme's work, the premise seems so absurd that one can't help but shake it until a metaphor falls out, and here one might well assume that, in the words of the novelist Donald Antrim, "I Bought a Little City" is "a take on the role that a writer has in writing a story — playing god, in a certain way". But Barthelme first arrived in Greenwich Village, where he would live for most of the rest of his life, in the winter of , just as local campaigners were narrowly defeating an attempt by the despotic city planner Robert Moses to run a lane elevated highway through the middle of Washington Square Park. For decades, Moses really did play god with New York, and for anyone who ever lived within his kingdom, "I Bought a Little City', which was first published in the New Yorker, might not have seemed so absurd after all. Those local campaigners were led by Jane Jacobs, another great Greenwich Village writer. For a rigorous and polemical manual of urban planning, it achieved a remarkably wide readership, perhaps because it's such a rare joy to read a book about cities written by someone who actually seems to appreciate what makes them fun to live in. As Lewis Mumford , one of Jacobs's opponents, wrote at the time: "Here was a new kind of 'expert', very refreshing in current planning circles, where minds unduly fascinated by computers carefully confine themselves to asking only the kind of question that computers can answer and are completely negligent of the human contents or the human results.